Wednesday, August 31, 2016

It all pays the same (or does it?)

[I originally posted this on LinkedIn, but reposting here to have a copy on my personal blog.]

Several jobs and quite a few years ago, I was venting about some work related frustration to a friend. Despite being someone who, like me, cared a great deal about doing the right things and doing them well, he had always been more sanguine than me in the face of perceived corporate wrongheadedness.

“It all pays the same,” he said. “If you’ve told them why you think it’s the wrong thing to do and they still insist then you might as well reconcile yourself to it.” It was good advice, even if it was hard to follow.

Over the years I’ve relayed this “it all pays the same” idea to many people who’ve expressed frustration at some of the things they’ve been asked to do at work. It’s a useful little trick, just like the 10-10-10 rule for decision making. It usually gets a wry smile even if it doesn’t really fix the situation that has them all wound up.

Recently though, I’ve developed an extended interpretation. It remains true that you are going to get paid the same whether you’re working on something you believe is going to save the world or something that strikes you as an egregious waste of human talent.

The difference between the two extremes though is the price you pay psychologically to reconcile yourself to working on something your heart isn’t in. I’d say working on something you don't genuinely care about is like paying a tax — a "meaninglessness tax” if you will.

Over the years I’ve written software that’s done many different things. Here’s just a few examples of things the software I’ve worked on has done:


  • organized emergency healthcare for people on vacation
  • managed order processing for discounted menswear
  • helped conduct clinical trials for promising new cancer drugs
  • sold e-books with titles like “6-pack abs in 6 weeks!”
  • facilitated the placement of billions of ads in browsers

You probably don’t need any help picking out the ones with a higher meaninglessness tax.

Job satisfaction requires more than working on something meaningful of course. It needs to be intellectually interesting, to offer opportunities for learning and growth, appropriate amounts of autonomy, flexibility and work/life balance. It needs great colleagues and fair pay; it needs a clear vision, good leadership and the ability to get work done without bureaucracy stifling your efforts. It might even need perks like free food and free beer on a Friday afternoon. But all those things aside, what it really needs most, I think, is a sense of meaningfulness.

----

Have you ever looked in your rear view mirror only to see the vehicle behind closing the gap at an alarming pace? Worse still, the driver is oblivious to the situation, focusing solely on their phone? For several years now, distracted driving has been a worse problem than drunk driving.

At my current job with Katasi I am helping bring to market a real solution to this problem. My meaninglessness tax rate is literally 0%. And so while previous work may have paid the same, I feel much better off now that I again have the chance to work on something so necessary and meaningful.

At Katasi we plan to be hiring soon. If you’d like to work with some great people, on a really meaningful product please get in touch and I can tell you more. Or take a look at http://katasi.com/ or this piece featuring us on CNN.

1 comment:

  1. Your story is really interesting for me and your blog is pretty good! Thanks a lot for sharing! Have you been as a part of some projects and work on it development team?

    ReplyDelete